W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > January 2011

Re: vocabs, metadata set, datasets

From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:25:52 -0500
To: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
Cc: "gordon@gordondunsire.com" <gordon@gordondunsire.com>, public-xg-lld@w3.org, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Message-ID: <20110121012552.GA3972@octavius>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 09:55:16AM +0100, Mark van Assem wrote:
> >Yes, we need to use a terminology related as recognizably as
> >possible to things already familiar to the intended reader,
> >but we also need to point out to readers where perspectives
> >differ.  On this point, I suggest we find a way to say
> >that "records" may provide descriptive statements "about"
> >more than one something.
> 
> So you could take the route that I took. First give a "familiar" /
> "rough" / "generic" description and then point out the
> problems/confusions with this generic view.

That would work for me.

Tom

-- 
Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Received on Friday, 21 January 2011 01:26:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 January 2011 01:26:34 GMT