- From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:00:00 +0100
- To: "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
- CC: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Hi all, As per my action I have written some text [1] to explain the terms "dataset, metadata element set, value vocabulary" with feedback from Karen and Antoine to address the things that don't fit very nicely. Please let me know what you think, after I've had your input we'll put it on the public list to get shot at. Mark. [1]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Library_terminology_informally_explained#Vocabularies.2C_Element_sets.2C_Datasets On 28/12/2010 18:40, Karen Coyle wrote: > I have been organizing the vocabularies and technologies on the archives > cluster page [1] and it was a very interesting exercise trying to > determine what category some of the "things" fit into. This could turn > out to be a starting place for our upcoming discussion of our > definitions since it has real examples. The hard part seems to be value > vocabularies v. datasets, and I have a feeling that there will not be a > clear line between them. > > kc > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_Archives#Vocabularies_and_Technologies > >
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2011 13:00:54 UTC