W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > February 2011

AW: Brainstorming: Key Issues

From: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:44:37 +0100
Message-ID: <3A59BB6451C972429019B12996F92DAD048F9FBD@frodo.zbw-nett.zbw-kiel.de>
To: <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
+1 to a) and b)

Cheers, Joachim  

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Ed Summers
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2011 16:25
> An: public-xg-lld@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: Brainstorming: Key Issues
> There has been some really good content in this thread so 
> far. I really liked the point that Antoine and Jeff 
> identified regarding what pre-web libraries have 
> traditionally called "surrogates" and the need for such a 
> notion on the web--in particular in the Linked Data space.
> It is an extremely important point which will largely effect 
> how well library data will fit in with the Linked Data 
> community, and the Web in general.
> I think this very specific point ripples out quite a bit, 
> into how vocabularies are used to describe library materials. 
> Perhaps it is too ambitious but I would like the final report 
> to make recommendations about what vocabularies are useful 
> for making library linked data available, and to identify 
> places where new vocabulary is needed.
> Kevin and Emmanuelle's point about needing to come up with a 
> compelling elevator pitch is also extremely important. I 
> would like to see some pretty clear language in the report 
> describing a) why library system developers might want to 
> consider using Linked Data, and b) why library professionals 
> should make Linked Data support a requirement when purchasing 
> or developing systems.
> //Ed
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 16:45:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:56 UTC