W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > February 2011

Re: use cases transcluded into a copy of the draft report

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:50:48 +0100
Message-ID: <4D5BD638.4030308@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Ooops I might have been too fast being happy. It seems that the toplevel structure has gone: is this because the transclusion just takes the source on the original pages, without adapting the header levels?

Trying to make my question clearer:

If an original page has as structure:
1. Use Cases
1.1 Use Case X

then id we transcluse that page in to

1. Clusters
1.1 Cluster 1
[Transclusion here]
1.2 Cluster 2.

Then the result is
1. Clusters
1.1 Cluster 1
2. Use Cases
2.1 Use Case X
2.2 Cluster 2.

?

If yes, then this argues for each "section" of [1] (use cases, recommendations, etc) we should prepare a specific version of itself, tailored for inclusion in the final report.
That may not be a huge problem, if we agree for example that the Use case section, for instance, should lead both to a section in the final report and a separate appendix document.

Antoine

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReport


>
> On 16 Feb 2011, at 12:48, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>
>> Hi Jodi,
>>
>>
>>> I've used transclusion to copy the use case sections into a copy of the draft report:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportWithTransclusion
>>> Please let me know if this is what you had in mind!
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I have left the original draft report unchanged in place at
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=DraftReport
>>> If we want to make significant changes to be reflected in both of these, we should talk about how to best do that. For instance, by separating out each section into a wiki page, or finding another collaborative writing system.
>>>
>>> Let me know if any of this needs adjustment!
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot for this. Personally, that's precisely what I wanted to see. And I don't think the transclusion needs adjustment itself:
>
> Great -- thanks for this!
>
>> it's rather the content that is being transcluded that needs further selection/curation :-)
>
> I agree.
>
>>
>> I think your suggestion of separating out each section into a wiki page, which could then be better curated by individual curators, is a good idea.
>
> Wonderful. If someone separates each section, I'll be happy to adjust the transclusion. Let me know.
>
> :) -Jodi
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 14:59:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 February 2011 14:59:19 GMT