- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:08:11 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
>>> ===MORE HAS BEEN DONE ON VALUE VOCABULARIES AND ELEMENT SETS THAN ON BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATASETS=== >>> 1) "Examples such the release of the British National Bibliography show that there are indeed considerable difficulties involved (many discussed in this report). However, this proves not deterring enough, and the number of datasets released as linked data keeps increasing at a fast pace." >>> >>> I think the difficulties need to either be directly mentioned, or a report from the BNB mentioned; otherwise this stands as a caution against adopting LLD. >> >> Like this one? >> http://consulting.talis.com/case-study/british-library-explores-linked-data/ > > I only skimmed this -- but my impression is that it's a bit promotional and not very detailed. I also have this: http://www.slideshare.net/nw13/establishing-the-connection-creating-a-linked-data-version-of-the-bnb but it's a presentation... And I know no fully fledged report. > My point is that this sounds off-putting without giving any details: "there are indeed considerable difficulties involved (many discussed in this report)." Maybe the difficulties could be enumerated, or otherwise referred to? Would using "challenges", as proposed by Karen, solve the issue? Honestly I don't remember what the list is: probably eliciting links to URIs from MARC records, finding a good data model... Antoine > >> >> >>> Draft Vocabularies Datasets As Current Situation >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_As_Current_Situation&diff=5808&oldid=5779 >> >>> Draft Vocabularies Datasets Section2 >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_Section2&diff=5816&oldid=5796 >> >> >> Thanks a lot! >> >> Cheers >> >> Antoine >> >
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 20:06:56 UTC