- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:41:24 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
> I'm not sure that people expected answers. I commented on some of the comments, but my guess is that the folks who commented are not going back there looking for a discussion (although some discussion between people did take place). Yes, I was just thinking of sending a thank you/notice that some changes have been done to take comments into account. > > What type of answers were you thinking of sending? Is it mainly: thank you for your comments? or will it specifically say what action was taken? My example (see below) was a quite detailed, but it is not extremely fine-grained, either. Antoine > Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>: > >> Sorry the subject is not so clear: I meant: answering the comments we received via the blog. (not mandatorily answering via the blog) >> >> Antoine >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We're in the process of reacting to the comments we've received by the blog on the (former) "available vocabularies and datasets" sections. I was wondering about whether to send public answers to the commenters, such as the draft below for Alan Danskin from British Library. >>> >>> This seems doable for that section, as the amount of comments is not so high. And Marcia, Jeff and William are already discussing by email (and thus internally keeping track of) the changes we make, anyway. >>> >>> But if we know already that answers cannot be made to every commenter, then it's maybe better to send private answers. Also, if we cc answers to public-lld, this may result in too high traffic for the occasional reader. Again I think it's ok for the "available vocabularies and datasets" sections, but I don't realize what the situation is for the other ones. >>> >>> Any opinion? >>> >>> Antoine >>> >>> ----- >>> >>> Dear Alan, >>> >>> We've seen with great pleasure that you have commented on the "Available Vocabularies and Datasets" section [1] of the Library Linked Data report. This is helpful feedback, thanks a lot! >>> To try to address come of your comments, we've in particular: >>> >>> - made some more mentions to the BNB effort: >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_Section&diff=5672&oldid=5669 >>> >>> - added the BNB CKAN package to the CKAN LLD group [2], which will cause it to appear in our Side deliverable (draft at [2]) >>> >>> - updated our small description of LCSH >>> >>> It is possible that the current organization of the report will be changed, as a result of other comments we received on other sections. The points above will however make their way in the final version, one way or the other. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Antoine >>> >>> >>> [1] http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/2011/06/26/available-vocabularies-and-datasets/ >>> [2] http://ckan.net/group/lld >>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Sunday, 14 August 2011 18:40:11 UTC