W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Answering comments via blog

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 07:54:30 -0700
Message-ID: <20110814075430.27136yrezfpbqco6@kcoyle.net>
To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
I'm not sure that people expected answers. I commented on some of the  
comments, but my guess is that the folks who commented are not going  
back there looking for a discussion (although some discussion between  
people did take place).

What type of answers were you thinking of sending? Is it mainly: thank  
you for your comments? or will it specifically say what action was  
taken?

kc

Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>:

> Sorry the subject is not so clear: I meant: answering the comments  
> we received via the blog. (not mandatorily answering via the blog)
>
> Antoine
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We're in the process of reacting to the comments we've received by  
>> the blog on the (former) "available vocabularies and datasets"  
>> sections. I was wondering about whether to send public answers to  
>> the commenters, such as the draft below for Alan Danskin from  
>> British Library.
>>
>> This seems doable for that section, as the amount of comments is  
>> not so high. And Marcia, Jeff and William are already discussing by  
>> email (and thus internally keeping track of) the changes we make,  
>> anyway.
>>
>> But if we know already that answers cannot be made to every  
>> commenter, then it's maybe better to send private answers. Also, if  
>> we cc answers to public-lld, this may result in too high traffic  
>> for the occasional reader. Again I think it's ok for the "available  
>> vocabularies and datasets" sections, but I don't realize what the  
>> situation is for the other ones.
>>
>> Any opinion?
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Dear Alan,
>>
>> We've seen with great pleasure that you have commented on the  
>> "Available Vocabularies and Datasets" section [1] of the Library  
>> Linked Data report. This is helpful feedback, thanks a lot!
>> To try to address come of your comments, we've in particular:
>>
>> - made some more mentions to the BNB effort:
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_Section&diff=5672&oldid=5669
>>
>> - added the BNB CKAN package to the CKAN LLD group [2], which will  
>> cause it to appear in our Side deliverable (draft at [2])
>>
>> - updated our small description of LCSH
>>
>> It is possible that the current organization of the report will be  
>> changed, as a result of other comments we received on other  
>> sections. The points above will however make their way in the final  
>> version, one way or the other.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>> [1]  
>> http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/2011/06/26/available-vocabularies-and-datasets/
>> [2] http://ckan.net/group/lld
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset
>>
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Sunday, 14 August 2011 14:55:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 14 August 2011 14:55:10 GMT