W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Changes to "Benefits" section

From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:45:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAODLZ4hyO1m75YJLd3xKXPC5Cko8x09BOQmxLouVbeBY+A87eA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kai Eckert <kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de>
Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Thanks Kai for proposing your contribution.
This definition doesn't fit in the Benefits section though, but in
Scope. The 2 are now separate.

Emma

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Kai Eckert
<kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> I agree with Karen: we could use some more precise wording here. Adrian
>> not having answered my request for a link, so I went and dig up the OKFN
>> definitions myself. There is ready-made stuff to re-use at
>> http://www.opendefinition.org/, especially:
>> - http://www.opendefinition.org/bibliographic/
>> - http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/#Data
>>
>> In fact I was thinking we could include "Open data" as a separate point
>> (next to Library data, Linked Data and Library Linked Data), re-using
>> *and pointing* to the OKFN page(s).
>>
>
> I think that is a very good idea and I also consider it absolutely necessary
> to state something about linked and open data. I volunteer to add such a
> section to the benefits section tomorrow, if noone opposes.
>
> I will reread the report, too, and see, if other sections need some
> rewording or clarification.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kai
>
> --
> Kai Eckert
> Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim
> Stellv. Leiter Abteilung Digitale Bibliotheksdienste
> Schloss Schneckhof West / 68131 Mannheim
> Tel. 0621/181-2946  Fax 0621/181-2918
>
>
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 15:46:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 August 2011 15:46:36 GMT