- From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:45:59 +0200
- To: Kai Eckert <kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Thanks Kai for proposing your contribution. This definition doesn't fit in the Benefits section though, but in Scope. The 2 are now separate. Emma On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Kai Eckert <kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de> wrote: > Hi all, > >> I agree with Karen: we could use some more precise wording here. Adrian >> not having answered my request for a link, so I went and dig up the OKFN >> definitions myself. There is ready-made stuff to re-use at >> http://www.opendefinition.org/, especially: >> - http://www.opendefinition.org/bibliographic/ >> - http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/#Data >> >> In fact I was thinking we could include "Open data" as a separate point >> (next to Library data, Linked Data and Library Linked Data), re-using >> *and pointing* to the OKFN page(s). >> > > I think that is a very good idea and I also consider it absolutely necessary > to state something about linked and open data. I volunteer to add such a > section to the benefits section tomorrow, if noone opposes. > > I will reread the report, too, and see, if other sections need some > rewording or clarification. > > Cheers, > > Kai > > -- > Kai Eckert > Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim > Stellv. Leiter Abteilung Digitale Bibliotheksdienste > Schloss Schneckhof West / 68131 Mannheim > Tel. 0621/181-2946 Fax 0621/181-2918 > >
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 15:46:35 UTC