- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:55:20 +0200
- To: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- CC: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Excellent, Jodi--I'm going to mark this in the discussion page! Antoine > Thanks, Antoine! I had forgotten about those comments, but I think that this really addresses " what's different when talking about vocabularies and datasets in the Semantic Web context, compared to earlier treatments of metadata schemes" > > /Examples/: > > * a record from a dataset for a given book could have a Subject element drawn from Dublin Core, and a value for Subject drawn from LCSH. > * the same dataset may contain records for authors as first-class entities that are linked from their book, described with elements like "name" from FOAF. > * a dataset may be self describing in that it contains information about itself as a distinct entity for example with a modified date and maintainer/curator elements drawn from Dublin Core. > > > -Jodi > > On 4 Aug 2011, at 22:33, Antoine Isaac wrote: > >> Hi Jodi, >> >> The discussion page on the section on available data still has one comment from you: >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Talk:Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_Section >> >> I've tried to address it in >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_Section2 >> "Though Linked Data technology changes the way to consider traditional library data categorization, we could classify these available resources into three[...]" >> >> But in fact in the meantime some details were also added by Marcia, Jeff, William and me into the different definitions in the separate deliverable >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#Introduction:_Scope_and_Definitions >> >> I hope it's good enough! >> >> Antoine >> >
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 21:53:59 UTC