- From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:20:09 +0100
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
On 20 Apr 2011, at 10:14, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Hi Jodi, Tom, > > Sorry for these quite late reactions... > > >>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:59:53AM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote: >>>> Here is the current draft Marcia, Jeff, William and me have been assembling >>>> so far: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset >>> >>> I took the liberty of penciling in a section at the beginning [1] >>> for defining "element set", "value vocabulary", and "dataset" as >>> per [2]. These terms need to be defined somewhere in the report >>> and this seems like a logical place to do it. >> >> Perfect. >> >> I see that the Vocabulary and Dataset is meant to be a separate deliverable, per the draft report outline: >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReport >> >> So far it looks like these definitions won't be used/needed in the main report. > > > Wondering about it: at least in the section of the report on vocabularies/datasets [3] (an important function of which will be pointing to the side deliverable) we'll have to mention these different terms, and thus explain them, I think. Yes, sorry -- I thought the separate deliverable was replacing that section. It makes sense to have such a section in the report too, so you're right! -Jodi > > Antoine > > >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#Definitions_and_scope >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Library_terminology_informally_explained#Definitions > [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReport#Available_vocabularies_and_datasets >
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 10:20:41 UTC