W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Transclusing the final report

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:21:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4DA59548.4090906@few.vu.nl>
To: Viljanen Kim <kim.viljanen@aalto.fi>
CC: "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Kim,

I had warned you, we have not much to put in the report right now :-)
As a matter of fact the draft many sections are not yet started.
I think currently we only have draft pages for:
- the benefits section (which will be "prosed" soon): http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_Benefits
- the problems and limitation section: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_issues_page

And I'm not even sure that these are transclude-able into some report.

The other material of the previous transcluded draft (http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_issues_page) would now be moved to separate deliverable. Especially for the use cases (btw, @everyone, I'm not sure what the use case section of the report should contain now: a summary from the separate deliverable?)

Also, I'm a bit puzzled when you mention a Java script: isn't the transclusion automatically kept up-to-date by virtue of the current mechanism? Or is the idea to make your own transclusion to solve some of the issues, like the re-use as such of the heading levels from the included page to the including page, which causes structure issues?



> To: Antoine or anybody,
> Hello!
> I promised in the previous telecon on 7th of April to do the transclusion of the final report. (Transclusions = including the content from some other wiki page to the current page, to make a long document that contains everything. Makes it e.g. easier to print the whole final report.)
> However, when I now looked at the final report [1], it was not clear to me what should/could be transcluded and what should not. (I was thinking about writing a small javascript or so to do the transclusion automatically.)
> My questions:
> 1) The H3 level topics with links (e.g. Bibliographic data, Authority data, ...) seem like likely candidates for transclusion. Any other parts in the document you think should be transcluded?
> 2) There are mentions in the page "Topics to be included here (with transclusion):" refering to "Category:CM.FRS" and "Category:LLD.VOCABS-STATUS", however there are no pages in any of these categories...
> If possible, I will write a simple Java?Script to do update transclusion page [2] automatically. To make things easier. :)
> Regards,
> Kim
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReport
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportWithTransclusion
> --
> Kim Viljanen, Semantic Computing Research Group, Aalto University, Finland
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 12:20:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:57 UTC