W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Agenda - Apr 7 2011 - LLD XG telecon - 1000 EDT

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:50:52 +0200
Message-ID: <4D9DC13C.60202@few.vu.nl>
To: Daniel Vila <dvila@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
CC: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Dear Daniel,

I think that's really going into the right direction, thanks!
Some comments before the call--I was noting them while reading your draft anyway, and I see many people won't be at the call today...

1. The graph, though simple, is a very useful thing.

2. It's good to see the extracted use cases together in one manageable document. It will help getting some more homogeneous descriptions.
By the way do not hesitate to ask cluster curators, if you think heavy edition is needed for these extracted use cases, which you can't do!

3. On the Agrovoc case, I'd have some comments on the words used. But it seems more appropriate to remark now that this small paragraph has the exact grain that would be required for case summaries, I think!

4. Generally, I's recommend to already put links to the individual cases and cluster pages. Whatever be their status in the end, they will remain on the wiki. and meanwhile that would help you and whomever from the group who'd like to help you.

5. I was wondering about the general structure. Wouldn't it be worth trying to start with the extracted use cases and then the contributed cases? (that's a real question, I'm not sure myself)

6. We should perhaps adapt the terminology. I remember Kai, Alexander and others arguing about the 45 "use cases" not being real use cases (some are more like case studies, and without real user scenarios). Perhaps we could use the more general "contributed cases" to refer to them.

Cheers,

Antoine


> I have just edited the UC Report wiki page [1]. I have had a very busy time the last few days and could not work on the report as much as I would have liked.
>
> What the wiki contains is basically the structure that could have the final UC report document. The table of contents looks huge but the document is organized that way in order to let me edit each single UC to add the summary without spending time searching for it.
>
> I have kept the original approach to separate the UCs into several clusters both for the short summaries and the extracted UC.
>
> As I said, I did not get the time to really start writing/editing the short summaries [2] but I will have some more free time within the next days and I will start adding them to the wiki.
>
> As for the extracted UC [3], I have just identified the section in every cluster and cut&pasted it to the wiki page so I can pull everything together and add styling to it. I would love to hear from your vision on how this section should be organized and if we will need to synthetize the information there.
>
> Feedback is much appreciated. Thanks for your collaboration.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport#Use_Cases_overview>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport#Use_Cases_overview
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport#Extracted_Use_Cases
>
>
> 2011/4/6 Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org <mailto:manue@figoblog.org>>
>
>     =============================
>
>     Agenda - Apr 7 2011 - LLD XG telecon - 1000 EDT
>
>     Source: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/RunningAgenda
>
>     Time - http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Telecons#Connection_info
>     http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html#s_4061
>     0700 Seattle - 1000 New York - 1500 London - 1600 Paris - 2300 Kuala Lumpur
>     2400 Tokyo - 0200 Sydney (next day)
>
>     W3C Library Linked Data Incubator group:
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/ - home page
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/ - wiki
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/ - group list
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lld/ - community list
>
>     LLD XG telecons:
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Telecons
>     Attendance is restricted to registered XG participants and
>     persons invited by chairs.
>
>     Chair: Emma
>     Scribe: ?
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/ScribeDuty
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/Scribing.html (how to)
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/TopicsDiscussed#Nicknames
>
>     Regrets:
>
>     ======================================================================
>     ADMIN
>     -- Minutes of previous telecon
>     PROPOSED: To accept
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/31-lld-minutes.html
>
>     -- Telecons - http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Telecons
>     Proposed schedule for next telecons, with scheduled chairs,
>     regrets received, and proposed topics
>     2011-04-14 Tom - discussion on available data & vocabularies
>     (owner). Regrets Monica.
>     2011-04-21 Antoine - discussion on requirements (owner)
>     2011-04-28 Emma - discussion on recommendations (owner)
>     2011-05-05 Tom - final report status, check on remaining actions
>     2011-05-12 Antoine - final report completed, reviewers
>     assigned for all sections
>     2011-05-19 Emma - Review of full draft of final report, and
>     discussion on potential nexts steps
>     2011-05-26 Antoine - final report wrap up & thanks - next steps if any
>
>     -- Telecon for participants in Asia-Pacific -- Postponed
>
>
>     ======================================================================
>     USE CASE CLUSTERS
>
>     -- Bibliographic data: curators Gordon, Martin
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_BibData
>
>     -- Authority data: curators Jeff, Alex, Joachim
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCases#Cluster:_Authority_data
>
>     -- Vocabulary alignment: curators Antoine, Michael, Marcia
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_VocAlign
>
>     -- Archives and heterogeneous data: curators Karen, Emmanuelle
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_Archives
>
>     -- Citations: curators Ed, Kai, Peter
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_Citations
>
>     -- Digital objects (Mark, Jodi, Asaf)
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_Digital_Objects
>
>     -- Collections (Gordon, Karen)
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_Collections
>
>     -- Social uses (Uldis, Jodi)
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_Social_Uses
>     2011-01-27: deadline is Feb 15th to receive suggested use cases
>
>     ACTION: Uldis and Jodi to create social uses cluster [recorded in
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/12/16-lld-minutes.html#action03]
>
>     ======================================================================
>     FINAL REPORT DRAFT
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReport
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportReviewerAssignments
>
>     3. Use cases and requirements (Daniel, others helping?) (represented
>     via clusters, plus an annotated list of use cases, plus requirement
>     list?)
>     -- separate deliverable
>     -- clusters need to be reviewed by neutral editors.
>     cf. #1 in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Feb/0034.html
>
>     Where do the following fit?
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Library_Data_Resources
>
>     ACTION: For Gordon and Karen to consider relation between problems and
>     limitation section and the library resource wiki page. [recorded in
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/24-lld-minutes.html#action01]
>
>     Six items:
>
>     1. Executive Summary
>     -- report section
>     -- written as a guide on how to read the document, high level view of
>     issues (but not only issues), should also be made available as
>     separate unit for print and distribute.
>     -- must be written late
>
>     2. Benefits of LD for libraries (Ed, Emmanuelle, Ross)
>     -- report section
>     -- extract benefits from clusters, use use cases as illustrations of
>     the benefits
>
>     -> See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lld/2011Mar/0190.html
>     -- Draft Benefits page: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_Benefits
>
>     [NEW] ACTION: Cluster owners to check the bullet-point list reflects
>     their understanding and covers relevant points [recorded in
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/31-lld-minutes.html#action04]
>
>     [NEW] ACTION: edsu, emma, rsinger to create narrative text and add to
>     bullet-points [recorded in
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/31-lld-minutes.html#action05]
>
>     4. Available data (vocabularies, datasets) (Antoine, Jeff, Marcia, William)
>     cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Mar/0006.html
>     1. Section in final report characterizing representative
>     vocabularies and datasets from the LOD cloud.
>     Identify gaps. Emphasize that this is a snapshot.
>     2. Separate "LLD vocabularies and datasets" deliverable
>
>     5. Relevant technologies (as described in #6 in
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Feb/0034.html)
>     Tools available - we can provide pointers to the ones available,
>     maybe short descriptions
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Tools
>
>     ACTION: Alex, Jeff, Martin, MichaelP elaborate on general purpose IT
>     architecture for dealing with linked data with caching feature (short
>     sketch for final report) [recorded in
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/24-lld-minutes.html#action04]
>
>     -> re-frame it into producing a section on "relevant technology" for
>     the report and/or a side deliverable?
>
>     Web Services on LLD page:
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Web_services_on_LLD
>
>     6. Problems and limitations (Karen, Peter, Tom, Gordon, Jodi)
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_issues_page
>     -- report section
>     cf. #4-5 in
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Feb/0034.html
>
>     7. Requirements and recommendations (Vocabularies, Identifiers, Data
>     modeling, Architecture, Links, General education and outreach,
>     Curricula)
>     -- requirements: what needs to be achieved, in general, to be
>     extracted from the issues
>     -- recommendations: what we (as a group) suggest as next steps
>     (example recommendation would be the creation of a working group)
>     -- Guenther's possible contribution on curricula:
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Mar/0068.html
>
>     ACTION: Karen to request feedback from community on recommendations
>     [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/24-lld-minutes.html#action04]
>     -> See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lld/2011Mar/0171.html
>
>
>     ======================================================================
>     AOB
>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 13:49:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 April 2011 13:49:33 GMT