W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > October 2010

Plans of the Digital Objects cluster team

From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:16:15 +0200
Message-ID: <4CCAC91F.4030005@cs.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi,

We, the "editors" of the Digital Objects cluster [1] (Jodi, Asaf, Mark), 
are considering our next steps and came up with the following:

1) considering which UCs belong to our cluster.

There are some orphan UCs which we can put in our cluster.

There's also some possible overlap with the Citation cluster we need to 
sort out - some UCs might belong in either or in both.

We've established the rule of thumb that when the main function in the 
UC is to aggregate different objects into one object, it belongs in the 
DO cluster.

2) homogenizing the descriptions of UCs.

There seems to be e.g. a lot of variation in how people write down the 
UC goals, but actually mean the same thing. We might even establish a 
few goal descriptions which are reusable in many UCs.

For example, the goal-1 (independent of LD) in our UCs tend to be 
aggregation of resources so people can find additional material related 
to a publication.

The goal-2 (where LD can help) is to reuse existing vocabularies 
(schemas such as ORE) and existing vocabularies of persons, books, etc.

3) provide links to vocabularies and example records used in UCs.

4) check which part of UC is done and which is future work

For example, we haven't been able to establish yet whether the Scholarly 
Debate UC [2] (in the Citations cluster) actually already has links 
between books / authors in their data, or whether this is future work.

Best,
Mark.

[1]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Cases#Cluster:_Digital_objects

[2]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Mapping_Scholarly_Debate





On 27/10/2010 21:58, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Another clarification, sorry for the spam.
>
> These in fact are still the raw minutes: we should add pointers to
> digested versions of:
> - the clustered use cases
> - the organization of topics re. the work that is needed on them
>
> Re. both of them we'll have to spend a bit of time agreeing on a
> formalization of what we captured with these colourful post-its :-)
>
> Antoine
>
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> A first attempt at organizing stuff can be found at
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minutes.html
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/24-lld-minutes.html
>>
>> I spare you the text version in this mail :-)
>>
>> Note that these pages include general references to the use case
>> slides and to Paul's pictures. But I did not have time to put links to
>> individual presentations or pictures in the parts of the HTML that are
>> connected to them.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 13:16:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 29 October 2010 13:16:57 GMT