W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Agenda question

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:02:12 +0200
Message-ID: <4CBF58D4.3030302@few.vu.nl>
To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>
CC: 'public-xg-lld' <public-xg-lld@w3.org>

> In http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh#Vocabularies_14:00-15:30_.2B_16:00-17:30
> /"Session activities:/ Looking of vocabularies in use cases and looking at them one by one. List classes of resources needed for use cases. Determine whether the current use cases mention them, whether the existing vocabularies cover their description adequately (if not, what are the gaps and what clarification are needed?), whether they are specified appropriately (expression of constraints, etc) and whether there is a need for alignments between them. Trying to generalise and about the issues related to these vocabularies in the way that Gordon has done in the piece that he posted."
> What is the piece Gordon posted?

Hmm, we could have been more explicit indeed :-/
In fact Gordon's document is the required reading mentioned below that sentence:


Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 21:02:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:38:36 UTC