Re: Use cases in wiki - Pittsburgh participants please sign up!

On 18 Oct 2010, at 10:32, gordon@gordondunsire.com wrote:

> Tom and others:
>  
> I've removed two duplicates from the list (both from Germany).
>  
> I've signed up to a few more. I don't intend (if no-one insists on being the presenter for some of these instead of me) to present the UCs one-by-one, but in at least two clusters: bibliographic record exchange/sharing/merging/access; and services requiring vocabulary control (Marcia and Karen have signed up for some UCs which also belong to this general cluster). Each UC will be mentioned, with salient factors, but I hope to generalise the common points for discussion. This approach also implies that presentations of UCs should be in clusters, not in the order given in the wiki, for example.

Yes, I think clustering is essential. We now have 42 use cases, and the ordering in the wiki is meaningless (combination of source, then alpha and order received, at present--anybody could reorganize that if they want).

We received quite a few use cases after the topics categorization was started.

It might be useful to add categories to the use cases themselves, based on clusters like
[[Category:vocabulary control]]
[[Category:bibliographic record]]
and/or the topics list, e.g.
[[Category:Legacy data]]

Or that might be overkill. 

:) -Jodi

>  
> And I expect we'll have further discussion about ensuring that each UC gets aired, but at the same time avoiding duplication, at DC-2101 before the LLDXG f2f.
>  
> Looking forward to seeing everyone in a couple of days.
>  
> Cheers
>  
> Gordon
> 
>  
> On 16 October 2010 at 15:06 Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:09:00PM +0100, Jodi Schneider wrote:
> > > Many thanks, Asgeir! This use case is now on the LLD wiki:
> > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Pode
> > >
> > > Thanks also for sharing the documentation and code links! They're now listed in 'further reading' in the use case.
> >
> > First of all, a big round of applause for Jodi for staying
> > on top of the flurry of use case submissions that have come
> > in over the past three days!
> >
> > We now have thirty-eight use cases on the agenda [1].  With
> > just two 90-minute sessions, which works out as follows:
> >
> >     180 minutes / 38 use cases, i.e.:
> >
> >     under 5 minutes per use case...!
> >
> > Of the 38 use cases, 17 remain unclaimed by "presenters".
> > In order to ensure we have full coverage for the discussion:
> >
> > -- 5 participants have signed up for two or more - great!
> >
> > -- 8 participants have signed up for one - would you consider
> >    signing up for a second?
> >
> > -- 6 participants have not yet signed up for any use cases.
> >    Everyone should please lead the discussion on at least one
> >    case.
> >
> > Please sign up by adding your name after a use case at [1]...
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh#Use_case_discussion_9:00-10:30_.2B_11:00-12:30
> >
> > --
> > Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
> >

Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 09:59:48 UTC