Re: Reply-To: header

It's much easier to reply-all than to take back messages sent mistakenly to the list, I think. :) -Jodi

On 6 Oct 2010, at 07:58, Antoine Isaac wrote:

> Hi Asaf,
> 
> FYI Coralie (our W3C contact) has asked the W3C systems team.
> 
> Antoine
> 
> 
>> Hi.
>> 
>> Is there a good reason for this list's setting to not set the Reply-To:
>> header to the list itself?
>> 
>>    Asaf
>> --
>> Asaf Bartov <asaf.bartov@gmail.com <mailto:asaf.bartov@gmail.com>>
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2010 09:27:10 UTC