W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Curating the Goals of Use Cases

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:21:28 +0100
Message-ID: <4CF56AD8.1000903@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Mark, Jodi

(and sorry for the delay answering the first mail Jodi has sent on the subject...)

I'm ok with your changes! It's much better like that.

Thanks,

Antoine


> Hi Antoine!
>
> (sorry for delay, slow connections in China)
>
>> Otherwise a small comment on naming. You make the distinction between
>> RELATE and ASSOCIATE, based on whether the target link between entities
>> exist in the data or is discovered as part of the case's scenario. To me
>> this also suggest the links would be of different (semantic) types. If
>> it is not the case, then I prefer the qualifier approach you had for the
>> previous list [3], where you had RELATIONS and RELATIONS-NEW (just to
>> make it 100% clear, it's the qualifier I like; on RELATIONS vs RELATE I
>> have strictly no opinion ;-)).
>
> We have decided to remove ASSOCIATE, and only have RELATE. Per your suggestion, qualifiers can be used to indicate whether it's "existing" and/or "new" relations that are represented, and the type of relation, e.g. "aggregation", so you would get e.g.
>
> RELATE (existing, aggregate).
>
> Best,
> Mark
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Goals
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 21:20:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 30 November 2010 21:20:57 GMT