W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > November 2010

Re: test of transclusion

From: Manue <manue@figoblog.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:26:23 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTin9WnM1xufgg+XhfcR7qJAnr5KCLtap+gLvQrmX@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
I've started creating category pages for each topic [1] and
reorganising [2] so that it's just a transclusion of these category
pages.
I'm not sure I'll have the time in the coming days to finish the work
I've started, so anyone please feel free  to continue ;-)

I have a question : how is this page related with [3] ? Currently, [2]
is organised exactly like [4].
I'm wondering if a "TopicsDiscussed" page shouldn't follow the new
organisation of topics we defined during the F2F. Wouldn't it help us
more with the first steps of the report ?

Once the transclusion is completed, it will be fairly easy to
reorganise [2] following [3], if that's what we want to do.

Emmanuelle

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Category:LLDTopics
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/TopicsDiscussed
[3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh_Outcomes#Use_cases_.26_Topics_9:00-10:30_.2B_11:00-12:30
[4] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Topics








On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
>
>> Transclusion does work on our wiki.
>>
>> Here's an example page.
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Transclusion_Test
>> Click 'edit' to look at the source and see how it's done.
>>
>
>
> Excellent!
> Thanks a lot, Jodi. I think this definitively sorts out how we should
> organize the topic pages on the wiki.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
>
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 11:26:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 8 November 2010 11:26:57 GMT