W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > November 2010

Re: scanning the use cases -- have we covered everything?

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:14:49 +0100
Message-ID: <4CD2DBF9.3020209@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Jodi,

> I know that we're overwhelmed with the existing use cases. But I'm wondering if we've got everything relevant?
> For instance, do we have use cases covering
> * vocabulary services like HIVE [1]
> * machine+computational uses
> Other missing topics? Add them to the list on the wiki [2], if you think of it. Maybe some were mentioned at the F2F?
> -Jodi
> [1] http://hive.nescent.org:9090/home.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Cases#Related_topics.2C_are_these_covered_yet.3F

In fact I trust that vocabulary services will be covered: we discussed that extensively in the F2F, and one bit of the outcomes [3] reads:
> DATA.VOCABS: need a use case for registries (RDA task group ?)

So it's kind of registered as a to-do.

One thing that we did not have the time to discuss in the F2F was whether we had complete coverage of the stuff appearing in the "use case notes" page [4].
Perhaps we should devote 10 minutes discussing that in a coming call, or via mail.



[3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh_Outcomes#Things_that_should_be_covered_by_use_cases
[4] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseNotes
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 16:14:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:55 UTC