W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > November 2010

AW: SemWeb terminology page

From: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 15:38:46 +0100
Message-ID: <3A59BB6451C972429019B12996F92DAD02E4D6A7@frodo.zbw-nett.zbw-kiel.de>
To: "Mark van Assem" <mark@cs.vu.nl>, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Cc: <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Good point, clarifications here would help a lot. 

Unfortunately, vocabulary is quite taken by a wider semweb discussion and woven into community activities (e.g. VoCamp, http://vocamp.org/wiki/Main_Page). Not sure how deal with this.

Cheers, Joachim

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Mark van Assem
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. November 2010 15:00
> An: Karen Coyle
> Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: SemWeb terminology page
> 
> About terminology:
> 
> I understand that FOAF, FRAD, ... are called "vocabularies" 
> by this group (although I would term them "schemas" or 
> "metadata schemas").
> 
> But what are AAT, LCSH, ... called, if not "vocabularies" (at 
> least I hope a separate term is reserved for terminological 
> resources).
> 
> Mark
> 
> On 29/10/2010 16:38, Karen Coyle wrote:
> > sorry about that prior glitch. I have started the 
> terminology page for 
> > semantic web terms:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Semantic_Web_terminology
> >
> > and did one entry as an example. I will work on it as I 
> have time, but 
> > please step in and add what you can. Remember, this is to be 
> > explanations for novices, not formal definitions, so please be 
> > user-friendly.
> >
> > kc
> >
> 
> --
>   Mark van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
>             http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 14:39:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 November 2010 14:39:23 GMT