- From: Emmanuelle Bermes <emmanuelle.bermes@bnf.fr>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:30:58 +0200
- Cc: "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:52 AM, William Waites <william.waites@okfn.org> wrote: > On 10-07-30 10:38, Jodi Schneider wrote: >> "The URI should be included in the final version of the metadata" >> >> Is it useful to make some reasons clear? i.e. to explain why it is "a >> valuable addition to the standard"? Or is that already clear to the >> NISO I2 working group? > > How about: > > "Dereferencing the URI with an HTTP request is the simplest and most > straightforward way to obtain a copy of the metadata" +1 > > On URI vs. URL, does it make sense at all to suggest the registration of > a urn namespace with IANA? Or do non-dereferenceable URIs like that just > muddy the waters? In a linked data perspective, I guess we should advocate strongly in favor of a dereferenceable URI approach. Emmanuelle > > Cheers, > -w > > -- > William Waites <william.waites@okfn.org> > Mob: +44 789 798 9965 Open Knowledge Foundation > Fax: +44 131 464 4948 Edinburgh, UK > > RDF Indexing, Clustering and Inferencing in Python > http://ordf.org/ > > -- ===== Emmanuelle Bermès - http://www.bnf.fr Manue - http://www.figoblog.org
Received on Friday, 30 July 2010 11:31:31 UTC