W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > July 2010

Re: LLD topics list

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:01:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4C406656.2060902@few.vu.nl>
To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
CC: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Karen,

>> But now that everyone has been made aware of the new structure, I think
>> we should just keep /wiki/topics as our reference.
>> In case someone wants to refer to the previous structure, it is still
>> possible to use [4]!
> I was thinking of leaving 2 and 3, creating #1 out of what is currently
> at topics, and copying topics3 to topics. does that sound good?

Yes, sorry for the delay (I'm on holidays this week).

[snip.] I'll move the part I've cut to the discussion section for the Topics page as you request

>> - is there a clear motivation for having items on "Use of Identifiers"
>> (once in "SW environmental issues", once in "Applying SW to library
>> data"). This could be confusing. Based on what you write for these two
>> sections, I understand that the items in "Applying SW to LLD" regards
>> the use of identifiers in a way really specific to library data. While
>> the other identifiers concerns can apply in other (non-library) domains
>> as well.
>> Is that right? In that case wouldn't "namespace policies" belong to the
>> more general (non-library specific) category?
>> Or is it in fact an item for which you are expecting some
>> clarification, as discussed for the action [5]?
> I think that the folks that contributed these short and possibly cryptic
> statements should feel free to move them if they are in the wrong
> sections. :-). There was a lot of guess-work in gathering the statements
> into areas, and I may have mis-interpreted what the contributors
> intended. Consider this only a first pass at organization.

Sure, I just wanted to trigger discussion! If none of the people interested in these "use of identifiers" topics (GordonD, dlukose, StuWeibel, emmanuelle, jyoung4, ndelaforge, keckert, digikim, bvatant) suggest to move them around, I'll accept that this is the right positioning.



> [1] http://dublincore.org/documents/singapore-framework/
>> Cheers,
>> Antoine
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Topics3
>> [2]
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#item07
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Topics2
>> [4]
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Topics&oldid=226
>> [5]
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#action08
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 14:02:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:54 UTC