W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > July 2010

LLD topics list

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:54:23 +0200
Message-ID: <4C3C7E1F.8090107@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Karen,

Continuing on the discussion we had re. the re-organized "LDD topics" list you created at [1] (cf. [2]).

I think there is a question that we did not answer:
> <kcoyle> should topics3 become topics?

When I created my own try at [3] I had opted for creating a new page, not to mess up with efforts of other people on the XG (either adding topics, or working on the use case template that refers to the LLD topics).

But now that everyone has been made aware of the new structure, I think we should just keep /wiki/topics as our reference.
In case someone wants to refer to the previous structure, it is still possible to use [4]!

On the content of the list itself, which is indeed much clearer than the previous (spontaneous) organization, I'd have two comments/questions:

- I have some trouble understanding why there is a section on "Conceptual Models and KOS" which is not in the "Applying SW to LD" one. Is it that you really want 2 analysis paths, one rather separate from linked data implementation issues ("These models do not determine particular technologies"), and the other one only concerned with implementation?
Both headers have similar SKOS items below them. This makes the distinction quite blurred for me. This, and the fact that maybe I prefer to see every problem from an implementation perspective anyway :-)

- is there a clear motivation for having items on "Use of Identifiers" (once in "SW environmental issues", once in "Applying SW to library data"). This could be confusing. Based on what you write for these two sections, I understand that the items in "Applying SW to LLD" regards the use of identifiers in a way really specific to library data. While the other identifiers concerns can apply in other (non-library) domains as well.
Is that right? In that case wouldn't "namespace policies" belong to the more general (non-library specific) category?
Or is it in fact an item for which you are expecting some clarification, as discussed for the action [5]?



[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Topics3
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#item07
[3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Topics2
[4] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Topics&oldid=226
[5] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#action08
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2010 14:54:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:54 UTC