W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > July 2010

Re: MARC Codes for Forms of Musical Composition

From: Ross Singer <ross.singer@talis.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 22:02:48 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTilruHqChSqdYVLA7El2ejpecyBG0aQEWzrtFFO6@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Waites <ww-keyword-okfn.193365@styx.org>
Cc: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, public-xg-lld@w3.org, List for Working Group on Open Bibliographic Data <open-bibliography@lists.okfn.org>, public-lld <public-lld@w3.org>
My question was more based on the fact that I don't think anything should
have explicitly set multiple rdf:types in there.

If so, I'm curious to what they are.

-Ross.

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, William Waites <william.waites@okfn.org>wrote:

> On 10-07-05 10:35, Ross Singer wrote:
> > Jeff, which resources have multiple rdf:types?  Of the muscomps, they
> > should all only be mo:Genre.
>
> I think it is perfectly valid to have multiple types. At the
> very minimum everything is an rdfs:Resource whether
> stated explicitly or not. If something breaks when it is
> explicitly stated because it doesn't like multiple types I
> think that something is itself broken...
>
> Cheers,
> -w
>
> --
> William Waites           <william.waites@okfn.org>
> Mob: +44 789 798 9965    Open Knowledge Foundation
> Fax: +44 131 464 4948                Edinburgh, UK
>
> RDF Indexing, Clustering and Inferencing in Python
>                http://ordf.org/
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 02:03:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 6 July 2010 02:03:17 GMT