W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > December 2010

Re: Use case notes page

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:59:32 +0100
Message-ID: <4D0B2674.2070209@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
+1.
That issue seems to match to a great extent cases such as LOCAH, Archipel and Europeana. Or in fact, Ed's note is about building resources that would be really useful for these cases. I've tried to capture that by adding a pointer at [1].

I'd let the curators of the Archive cluster confirm this, and perhaps add stuff from Ed's note in their descriptions.
But as Karen is one of these curators, I guess this is already handled well :-)

Cheers,

Antoine

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabularies#Vocabularies_for_which_no_RDF_version_is_available


> Jodi, I think that this needs expressed in this email are already covered in the archives/heterogeneous use cases. Does anyone think that we need this specific issue written up as a new use case?
>
> kc
>
> Quoting Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>:
>
>> There were four use cases left (not crossed out) here:
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=UseCaseNotes&oldid=2128
>>
>> Three I've already discussed in a separate email. The fourth of these, I'll defer to the Archives/heterogeneous items group to consider whether it's relevant. This came from one of Ed's blog posts [1] , on the question of knitting together multiple identifiers:
>>
>>>> * archives and linked data, knitting together multiple identifiers <http://inkdroid.org/journal/2010/08/12/archival-context-on-the-web/>
>>
>> -Jodi
>>
>> [1] http://inkdroid.org/journal/2010/08/12/archival-context-on-the-web/
>>
>> On 11 Nov 2010, at 17:32, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jodi,
>>>
>>> Thanks. So you think that these items should definitely covered by more use cases? I was actually not sure that this was the case... Perhaps we have in fact already some cases for them, I just did not have the time to dive into what they were describing.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>>
>>>> I added 4 items to the 'things that should be covered by use cases' from
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=UseCaseNotes&oldid=2128 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=UseCaseNotes&oldid=2128>
>>>>
>>>> * *Link Social Bibliography to a Bibliographic Network*. Link reviews, tags, lists, cover art to a work. /This seems like a variation on the enrich a record use case./
>>>> * *Find stuff in several collections*.Searching a specific set of library and non-library collections--for instance to find a given book or DVD, or get access to an article. I'm thinking about this first as a local area search with a specific set of libraries--but then also as a 'travel' awareness search (for the harder-to-find things I'm willing to go out of my way to find, while travelling). I'd love, for instance, a mashup between TripIt/Dopplr, my calendar of availability, and my LibraryThing wishlist -- alerting me to possibilities to use items I can't get locally when I have a free day out-of-town. Jodi Schneider <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/User:Jschneid4> 13:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC) /It seems that we don't have any such far-stretching case. Or this item rather calling for enabling mesh-ups, not doing them? (Antoine)/
>>>> * *Find e-books* see http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2010/07/finding-ebooks.html
>>>> * archives and linked data, knitting together multiple identifiers <http://inkdroid.org/journal/2010/08/12/archival-context-on-the-web/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can expand with more detail if it's helpful.
>>>>
>>>> -Jodi
>>>>
>>>> On 11 Nov 2010, at 10:38, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've started some clean-up of http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseNotes
>>>>> hoping that pretty soon we could just remove it from [1], as part of an attempt to have [2] as only one list of things that should motivate our searching for new cases.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not yet dead, though. Feedback is welcome from these who created the non-deleted items: please declare them as dead of move them to [2]! We could discuss them in a next call whether we're interested enough to include them in the list we agreed upon at the F2F...
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Antoine
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCases#Related_topics.2C_are_these_covered_yet.3F
>>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh_Outcomes#Things_that_should_be_covered_by_use_cases
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 17 December 2010 09:05:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 17 December 2010 09:05:58 GMT