- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:29:17 -0500
- To: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- CC: ext Satish S <satish@google.com>, Peter Beverloo <peter@chromium.org>, Glen Shires <gshires@google.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
On 1/9/12 11:12 AM, ext Olli Pettay wrote: > On 01/09/2012 04:59 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> As I indicated in [1], WebApps already has a relatively large number of >> specs in progress and the group has agreed to add some new specs. As >> such, to review any new charter addition proposals, I think we need at >> least the following: >> >> 3. Implementation commitments from at least two WG members > Is this really requirement nowadays? Strictly speaking No. However, I think it is a useful data point when evaluating a proposal, especially since a spec cannot advance to Recommendation without two or more implementations. OTOH, I also think we need to be flexible enough to accommodate a new feature proposal where there is lots of interest in fleshing out the details yet the details are still too vague for someone to make an implementation commitment. > But anyway, I'm interested to implement the speech API, > and as far as I know, also other people involved with Mozilla > have shown interest. Thanks for this feedback. -AB
Received on Monday, 9 January 2012 17:29:59 UTC