W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org > April 2011

RE: Revised group report draft

From: Robert Brown <Robert.Brown@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:30:49 +0000
To: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>, "Olli@pettay.fi" <Olli@pettay.fi>
CC: "public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org" <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org>
Message-ID: <113BCF28740AF44989BE7D3F84AE18DD198CF678@TK5EX14MBXC112.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
This partly reflects my own incomplete understanding of eventing.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Burnett
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 7:57 AM
To: Olli@pettay.fi
Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
Subject: Re: Revised group report draft

I understand.  I merely wrote what was asked, I think by Robert.  I believe he had concerns in particular with the bubbling phase of DOM Event propagation and possible consequences of it, but I'll let him explain :)

-- dan

On Apr 21, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Olli Pettay wrote:

> On 04/19/2011 11:55 PM, Dan Burnett wrote:
>>
>>    C Topics remaining to be discussed
> ...
>>  * How will eventing work in Javascript? What about event bubbling?
>>
>
> I'm not sure what this means. In web platform events are DOM Events 
> and event propagation (I think you mean propagation, not bubbling) is 
> defined DOM Events spec. (There are DOM 2 Events Rec, DOM 3 Events 
> draft, and Web DOM Core draft, which has also some basic definition 
> for events. All those 3 specs are more or less compatible in the event
> propagation)
>
> If we need to add new event types, or even new event interfaces, that 
> is ok, and no need to change any other specification because of that.
>
>
> -Olli
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 16:31:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 21 April 2011 16:31:30 GMT