- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:36:54 +0200
- To: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- CC: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
On 11/08/2010 06:18 PM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > This was already discussed partly in the thread about R18. As I said > there, I think that the only point of a latency requirement would be > to make sure that spec proposals don't prohibit low-latency > processing. For example, a spec that requires that audio capture must > finish without the user aborting it before any audio transmission or > speech processing is allowed to take place would force high latency in > implementations. Thus I propose that we replace R17 with the > following: > > "Implementations should be allowed to start processing captured audio > before the capture completes." Sounds ok to me. -Olli > > /Bjorn > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Dan Burnett<dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote: >> Group, >> >> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on our >> ranking approach [1]. >> >> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and >> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 17 [2]. >> >> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. Outstanding >> points of contention will be discussed live at the next teleconference. >> >> -- dan >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html >> [2] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r17 >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 16:37:30 UTC