Re: TPAC meeting and confidentiality

On 11/01/2010 04:22 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> Yes, that was definitely the intention.
Good :)

   Where is this marked?  It's
> probably just an oversight.

In the schedule we got this morning during registration.

The web page http://www.w3.org/2010/11/TPAC/Schedule
mixes MMI/Voice and HTML Speech, so it is hard to say whether
the confidentiality applies to both.


-Olli


>
> J
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi
> <mailto:Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I wonder why the TPAC meeting is marked as "Member-Confidential".
>     The charter isn't quite clear whether that is ok - it
>     talks only about public mailing list, not really
>     whether f2f and teleconferences are public.
>     But I have to admit I did interpret the charter so that
>     all the work would happen in public (well, except
>     possible "Administrative tasks")
>
>
>     br,
>
>
>     -Olli
>
>

Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 15:27:18 UTC