W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org > December 2010

Re: "Protocol" requirement - Interpretation

From: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:13:04 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimd_0ctimLaTM8Gen9aghFChbvWRc_46GXLysiW@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Young, Milan" <Milan.Young@nuance.com>
Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
Why does this have to be part of the speech API? Remote text
interpretation can be done without using any speech APIs. I've
implemented that myself a couple of times using just XmlHttpRequest.


On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Young, Milan <Milan.Young@nuance.com> wrote:
> Summary – Web applications must be able to request NL interpretation based
> only on text input (no audio sent).
> Description – Recognizers commonly separate lexical speech token processing
> from its semantic understanding.  This often requires multiple passes of
> semantic processing.

Bjorn Bringert
Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham
Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ
Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 10:13:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 13 December 2010 10:13:35 GMT