- From: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:10:28 +0000
- To: "Young, Milan" <Milan.Young@nuance.com>
- Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
What is best practices seems like a matter of interpretation. This is a bit like saying "proposals should not be bad". There are a lot of technical problems that proposals could have, and I don't think there's much point in enumerating them in the requirements. /Bjorn On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Young, Milan <Milan.Young@nuance.com> wrote: > Summary – Communication between Web application and remote speech service > must not rely on procedures which are in conflict to best practices > established by underlying protocol. > > > > Description – Want to avoid a situation where the only way of accomplishing > requirements is through a violation of best practices. For example, if > requirements could only be attained by disabling HTTP 1.1 persistent > connections, that would be an unacceptable proposal. > > -- Bjorn Bringert Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 10:10:59 UTC