RE: R34. A trust relation is needed between end user and whatever is doing recognition

I also think that FPR10 is better-- it's much more specific, and so there's no need for R34.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Bringert
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 5:44 AM
> To: Dan Burnett
> Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
> Subject: Re: R34. A trust relation is needed between end user and whatever
> is doing recognition
> 
> I think that  "FPR10. If browser uses speech services other than the
> default one, it must inform the user which one(s) it is using." is a
> better requirement and that we can drop R34.
> 
> /Bjorn
> 
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote:
> > Group,
> >
> > This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on our
> > ranking approach [1].
> >
> > This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and
> > opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 34 [2].
> >
> > Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting.  Outstanding
> > points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming teleconference.
> >
> > -- dan
> >
> > [1]
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-
> htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html
> > [2]
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-
> 0001/speech.html#r34
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Bjorn Bringert
> Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham
> Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ
> Registered in England Number: 3977902