W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org > December 2010

Re: R25. It should be easy to extend the standard without affecting existing speech applications

From: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:37:47 -0500
Cc: Olli@pettay.fi, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
Message-Id: <A97833C3-DD0A-4661-879E-D09F58F2476B@voxeo.com>
To: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
It appears that we have consensus to keep this requirement.  We will  
confirm this in today's teleconference.

-- dan

On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:21 AM, Bjorn Bringert wrote:

> I agree with everything Olli said.
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Olli Pettay  
> <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote:
>> Isn't this already (at least partially) covered by the requirement to
>> be able to give parameters to speech engines and requirement to  
>> support
>> EMMA or something similar.
>>
>> But anyway, I think we should keep this requirement.
>>
>>
>> -Olli
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/22/2010 10:07 AM, Dan Burnett wrote:
>>>
>>> Group,
>>>
>>> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize  
>>> based on
>>> our ranking approach [1].
>>>
>>> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion,  
>>> and
>>> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 25 [2].
>>>
>>> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting.
>>> Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an  
>>> upcoming
>>> teleconference.
>>>
>>> -- dan
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html
>>> [2]
>>>
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r25
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Bjorn Bringert
> Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham
> Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ
> Registered in England Number: 3977902
>
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 13:38:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 2 December 2010 13:39:19 GMT