W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-geo@w3.org > March 2007

Telecon agenda 19 March

From: Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@traversetechnologies.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:15:43 -0400
To: GeoXG GeoXG <member-xg-geo@w3.org>, GeoXG GeoXG <public-xg-geo@w3.org>
Message-Id: <46A0EEED-B399-43DD-9D31-C762FB2895C2@traversetechnologies.com>
Hi,

For today's call,

Review and comments on neogeo vocabulary. Is it complete? Is it  
correct? What shall we do with it? Is there material from the  
GeoQualifier proposal which should be incorporated?

Next steps - discussion of further work items

Question: is it valuable to proceed with the basic ontologies  
outlined in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/Wiki/ 
Spatial_Ontologies which might then become the concern of an Interest  
Group

"or"

would it be more valuable to get started on a geospatial "dialect"  
like GeoSWRL (thanks to Dave Kolas and Mike Dean) which could become  
a W3C Recommendation and concern of a Working Group?

See you then.

Josh Lieberman
Geospatial XG Coordinator

Principal, Traverse Technologies Inc.
mailto:jlieberman@traversetechnologies.com
tel +1 (617) 395-7766
fax: +1 (815) 717-981
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 14:17:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:18 GMT