- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:40:35 +0100
- To: Alexandre Passant <alex@passant.org>
- Cc: public-xg-geo@w3.org, foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org, Marc <marc@geonames.org>
Hi Alexandre > The other idea would be to create a new property as locatedIn (in > geonames or in geo84 ontology, or even new namespace) that will link > any owl:Thing / rdf:Resource (and not only subclasses of SpatialThing) > to a geo84:SpatialThing, and that then can be subclassed: As the editor of geonames ontology, I am quite in favor of adding a generic "geonames:locatedIn" property with an open domain, and range "geonames:Feature". Marc, any opposition? > bornIn > worksIn > establishedIn Yes, let more specific ontologies define those as subproperties of the generic "geonames:locatedIn" > I'll be happy to get feedback about these ideas. You've got at least one :)) Cheers Bernard -- *Bernard Vatant *Knowledge Engineering ---------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** *3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com> ---------------------------------------------------- Tel: +33 (0) 871 488 459 Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> Blog: Leçons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/>
Received on Friday, 26 January 2007 16:40:51 UTC