Re: FOAF, geonames, and more

Hi Alexandre

> The other idea would be to create a new property as locatedIn (in
> geonames or in geo84 ontology, or even new namespace) that will link
> any owl:Thing / rdf:Resource (and not only subclasses of SpatialThing)
> to a geo84:SpatialThing, and that then can be subclassed:
As the editor of geonames ontology, I am quite in favor of adding a 
generic "geonames:locatedIn" property with an open domain, and range 
"geonames:Feature".
Marc, any opposition?
> bornIn
> worksIn
> establishedIn
Yes, let more specific ontologies define those as subproperties of the 
generic "geonames:locatedIn"
> I'll be happy to get feedback about these ideas.
You've got at least one :))

Cheers

Bernard

-- 

*Bernard Vatant
*Knowledge Engineering
----------------------------------------------------
*Mondeca**
*3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
Web:    www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com>
----------------------------------------------------
Tel:       +33 (0) 871 488 459
Mail:     bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Blog:    Leçons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/>