Re: [georss] Scaling/size of geographical entities

I think radius is in dispute... I forget who likes it and who does  
not. The issue, as far as I recall, is that GML does not have a  
circle that's defined by a point and a radius so GeoRSS Simple can't  
have one.

	Allan

On Jul 21, 2006, at 16:43, Andrew Turner wrote:

> Holger Knublauch  wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Joshua.  With a basic glimpse on this, I would hope that  
>> the geo
>> ontology is extended with a geo:radius attribute: it is a low hanging
>> fruit while having feature types is probably an overkill.  To specify
>
> There is a radius in GeoRSS Simple:
>
>   <georss:point radius="500">45.256 -110.45</georss:point>
>
> It was at the bottom of the "Simple" page, so maybe you missed it. :)
> Andrew
>
> -- 
> Andrew Turner
> ajturner@highearthorbit.com        42.4266N x 83.4931W
> http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA
> _______________________________________________
> georss mailing list
> georss@lists.eogeo.org
> http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss

-- 
Allan Doyle
+1.781.433.2695
adoyle@eogeo.org