On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 10:58 +0200, Eric van der Vlist wrote: > Dan, > > Despite the appearances, I think that we agree on most of these points. [...] > It looks like the major blocking point in this discussion are the 404 > errors and I'll try to make some proposals to the INSEE to try to change > that. > > Does that sound reasonable? Anything that addresses the 404 errors is a significant improvement, yes. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Saturday, 5 August 2006 16:07:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:18 GMT