- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:52:24 +0200
- To: public-xg-federatedsocialweb <public-xg-federatedsocialweb@w3.org>
On 26 August 2011 16:09, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > On 26 August 2011 15:32, 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr> wrote: >> Are there proposed group related FSW ? >> >> I'm not sure that new community group would be suitable than FSW XG. >> >> Current Community Groups: http://www.w3.org/community/groups/ >> Proposed Groups : http://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/ >> Comparisons of Group Types : http://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/compare/ > > As you say, the current "Incubator Group" is just fine. However my > understanding is that W3C expects community groups to eventually > replace the Incubator mechanism. So in a few years, there will only be > Community Groups, not CGs + XGs. Whether current incubators want to, > or need to, transition is a separate question, I believe. Incubator > groups have short-term charters. A couple more points. I checked with Ian Jacobs at W3C. As a group transitioning from the Incubator activity, we could keep using the teleconference bridge, and also this email list. So no need to re-subscribe everyone to a new CG list. So that all seems good so far. Dan
Received on Friday, 26 August 2011 14:52:52 UTC