W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-emotion@w3.org > January 2008

AW: Example RDF link

From: Björn Schuller <schuller@tum.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:39:15 +0100
To: <public-xg-emotion@w3.org>
Message-Id: <023401c85c54$8b08b0f0$a11a12d0$@de>
Hi,

 

I tried to convert Myriam’s example into flat XML according to EARL (“**”
marks tags that are non-existant in EARL, skipped most comments …). Please
excuse if I misinterpreted something. This does however not well reveal the
difference between deep and flat XML structure depending on the example
chosen. Also, there is now a difference to Ian’s example sticking to 4.1.1.
I can well provide further examples if desired, when Bill decides which
example to stick to (for OWL, that is…).

 

Best,

 

Bjoern

 

Von: public-xg-emotion-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-xg-emotion-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Myriam Lamolle
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Januar 2008 13:14
An: Ian Wilson
Cc: public-xg-emotion@w3.org
Betreff: Re: Example RDF link

 

Hi,
you can see an example of emoxg deep structure representation online :
http://www.iut.univ-paris8.fr/~lamolle/EMOXG/example_deep_emoxg.xml
<http://www.iut.univ-paris8.fr/%7Elamolle/EMOXG/example_deep_emoxg.xml>  
I take into account use case requirements...
I integrated also some global metadata (such as social environment) in the
definition of emoxg but they don't appears in the example...

For Ian,
you wrote : 
"RDF is primarily aimed at semantic web applications where the data is to
be read by another application, rather than a person. It contains a lot 
of data so is heavier than XML.
However, one useful point for what we are doing is that terms can be 
defined and referenced, as opposed to XML where the terms are your own
construction and are not defined, so if you had an XML attribute called 
"label" you do not know if that means a "tag", a package label or a
record label. With RDF there is a URI to where each term is defined so
this ambiguity is resolved. Our effort has making terms unambiguous as a 
goal I think?"

I think it's possible to add semantic in the type definition in XML Schema
Definition 
using <span class="tag"> for example to specify "label" is a tag... but it's
not easier than RDF... 

Myriam



2008/1/17, Ian Wilson <ian@neon.ai>:


I see the inline example is difficult to read with the small format of 
this mailing list view, so here is a link to the file online:

http://www.neon.ai/docs/emoxgRDFexample.rdf 

You should be able to see this nicely in your browser or right click and 
save it.

Ian






-- 
IUT de Montreuil - Département Informatique
140, rue de la Nouvelle France
93100 Montreuil

tél: +33 (0)1 48 70 34 61 





Received on Monday, 21 January 2008 17:39:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 January 2008 17:39:46 GMT