Hi all, On 2008-09-12, at 0704, Carl Reed wrote: > A few emails ago I promised to provide clarification on the use of > the terms "location" viz "position". Turns out that after reviewing > the use of these terms in ISO, the OGC, and the IETF there appears > to be consistency! > > ISO 19112 > location: identifiable geographic place > > ISO 19133 > position: data type that describes a point or geometry potentially > occupied by an object or person From that, I would read that location is something that doesn't move, e.g. a town - an identifiable geographic place. An object/person has a property called position that identifies its current location. So, anything that can move has a position, and everything that can't move (and this may include buildings, monuments etc) has a location. A position of course, can be mapped to a location (e.g. to calculate nearby locations). Cheers GavReceived on Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:52:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 October 2008 02:05:11 GMT