Dear Mandana thanks again for your continued effort in trying to represent the outcome of the discussions in the diagram updates i think this would work (until we find more bugs), the only thing that is slighlty disturbing is all those lines going across everywhere, and wonder if a) would who/where/what be more tidy? b) other way of simplifying the relationships (without losing any) Next, in addition to start compiling the CV based on this, i have started having triples in my mind I have never written RDF, but I am eager to learn i suppose if we start working with the schema, the next is how to rdfize it, doe everybody agree? (yes/no answers welcome) if yes, does anybody want to have a crack? Looks like a perfect triple in principle, not sure how to differentiate the various subtypes (who can be contactperson, or affectedperson, organization etc) within the triple advice welcome, otherwise I ll find someone to help us cheers PDM On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Mandana Sotoodeh <mandanas@ece.ubc.ca> wrote: > Dear all, > > Please find the latest model (and description) at > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/eiif/wiki/WWWWCoord#Current_W3_Model > > Regards, > Mandana > -- Paola Di Maio School of IT www.mfu.ac.th *********************************************Received on Saturday, 4 October 2008 08:04:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 October 2008 02:05:12 GMT