On 23 Feb 2008, at 01:52, Carl Reed wrote: > I know that Renato did mention "categorize". I would like to add > that without context, providing an unstructured list of possible > applicable standards for use in the EM community may be confusing. I agree Carl - I wanted to start collecting first, then have a go at some more formal way of categorising. For now, it would be good to add some of your own "context" keywords in the Type/Scope row of the table. > In addition to some level of reference architecture, process and > wiring diagrams might also help to show how each standard is related > to another standard for use in the EM community. Yes, this would be the end-goal we are working towards for our "framework" Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTAReceived on Sunday, 24 February 2008 03:34:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 October 2008 02:05:09 GMT