IETF RFCs

• From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
• Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:52:00 +0700
• To: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@baylink.com>
• Cc: "public-xg-eiif eiif list" <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <c09b00eb0812062052u53dca80bv6d116ed3f605179b@mail.gmail.com>

 Jay and Craig

unless someone has objection on placing efforts towards some level of compliance
with IETF RFC's  (so far we have two people in favour)

and since you seem familiar with it, would you give us some input
on how to go about it?



cheers

PDM

> On another current point, about ISO 8601 timestamps...  I concur with the
> person who
> asserted that IETF RFCs are an *excellent* target for the degree of rigor to
> which
> a standard's quality and degree of detail should be held, and, on point, I
> think
> that as long as the standard specifies that ISO 8601 timestamps *which must
> include
> timezones* (since "timestamps" *always must include timezones*), that ought
> to
> satisfy.  No?
>
>

Received on Sunday, 7 December 2008 04:52:35 UTC