W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-eiif@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Requirement for 3W interop standard (new proposed schema attached)

From: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:37:52 +0700
Message-ID: <c09b00eb0808100537n255fa526oc98972d679717ab@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Gavin Treadgold" <gt@kestrel.co.nz>
Cc: public-xg-eiif <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
Gavin



> My understanding is the 3W is 'just' a directory application, hence the
> schema is designed around providing directory services.


May I ask what is that assumption based on?
Did we as a group discuss/agree on such a constraint?
 Is there any more useful purpose for which we need a 3W metaset?
Is the schema for a service directory part of our mission ?



assuming 'directory' is accetaptable description for everybody, it should be
designed
to be flexible to accommodate for all stakeholder  requirements, so we
definetely gotta talk




-- 
Paola Di Maio
School of IT
www.mfu.ac.th
*********************************************
Received on Sunday, 10 August 2008 12:38:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 October 2008 02:05:11 GMT