W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-cwl@w3.org > October 2007

RE: Call for Participation in F2F meeting of CWL-XG (1st Announcement)

From: Hiroshi Uchida <uchida@instsec.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:00:52 +0900
To: "'Enrico Franconi'" <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
Cc: <public-xg-cwl@w3.org>, <member-xg-cwl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003601c80654$4d8747b0$e895d710$@org>

Dear Enrico

Thank you for your natural comment.
And also thank you for pointing out my mistake of the address of last mail
to be sent.

Best regards
Hiroshi Uchida


> -----Original Message-----
> From: member-xg-cwl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:member-xg-cwl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Enrico Franconi
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 11:29 PM
> To: uchida@instsec.orguchida@instsec.org
> Cc: public-xg-cwl@w3.org; member-xg-cwl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Call for Participation in F2F meeting of CWL-XG (1st
> Announcement)
> 
> Hi,
> I really don't understand what's going on.
> There is still nothing going on in the W3C group after one year, no
> information, no discussion, not even the minutes of last year's F2F,
> even if I did ask for all this to happen nine months ago. Those
> requests are still unanswered.
> Moreover, this message has not been sent to the WG members list.
> How can you pretend that interested memebrs come to an F2F meeting if
> nothing has been public since last year F2F meeting, of which we
> don't know even the minutes?
> Is this a personal affair?
> We don't have *anything* but the charter available ;-(
> cheers
> --e.
> 
> -----
> 
> > From: "Hiroshi Uchida" <uchida@undl.org>
> > Date: 20 February 2007 18:33:57 GMT+01:00
> > To: "'Enrico Franconi'" <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
> > Cc: <yokoi@media.teu.ac.jp>, "'Hiroshi_Yasuhara'" <yasuhara-
> > hiroshi@jcom.home.ne.jp>
> > Subject: RE: What's going on with this group?
> >
> > Dear Enrico
> >
> >> I have seen zero activity in this group so far.
> >
> > We are sorry for the delay of real launching of CWL-XG due to the
> > internal
> > setup and globalization of necessary documents (actually the
> > translation of
> > necessary documents from Japanese into English.)
> >
> >> I have just realised that there was a call for a F2F meeting
> >> sent out on the public mailing list; why members of the group
> >> did not receive this message? I don't see material or minutes
> >> published anywhere in the group pages.
> >
> > Sorry for the long delay as well, the minites of the F2F meeting
> > will apear
> > in this week.
> >
> >> Is there anybody coordinating the activities who could
> >> explain where the discussions are going on?
> >
> > The necessary documents will be provided middle of March and we
> > will start
> > discussion based on the actual application of CWL for some corpus and
> > several situations.
> > We will also have a tele-meeting very beginning of March to discuss
> > how to
> > evaluate the current CWL and who will contribute to which aspect or
> > part.
> > More detailed agenda will be announced soon.
> >
> > By the way, if you do not mind,I would like to know in which
> > aspect  of this
> > XG you are interesting.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Hiroshi Uchida
> > Chair, CWL-XG
> 
> -----
> 
> > From: "Hiroshi Uchida" <uchida@undl.org>
> > Date: 22 February 2007 08:23:42 GMT+01:00
> > To: "'Enrico Franconi'" <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
> > Cc: <yokoi@media.teu.ac.jp>, "'Hiroshi_Yasuhara'" <yasuhara-
> > hiroshi@jcom.home.ne.jp>, <member-xg-cwl@w3.org>
> > Subject: RE: What's going on with this group?
> >
> > Dear Enrico
> >
> >> Sure, but I expect this discussion to happen on the group
> >> list, so that everybody will be aware of the various
> >> interests and expertises :-) Probably you could call for a
> >> round of introductions by the group members, after the
> >> coordinators have intorduced themselves, and they have put
> >> some more material online to have some common background.
> >
> > O.K. I will do.
> >
> >> By the way, apparently there is only 1 person - apart from us
> >> - in the group who are neither among the coordinators, nor
> >> one of the invited experts by them. Is there any plan to have
> >> a more representative group?
> >
> > I have some plans and actually making a call for participation, but
> > if you
> > have some ideas, please let me know.
> >
> >> Anyway, a first quick answer to your question.
> >>
> >> First of all, I was puzzled by the statement in the charter:
> >> "The CDL (Concept Description Language) is a language
> >> proposed by ISeC for Semantic Computing (SeC) R&D. CDL is
> >> fundamental language within SeC (Semantic Computing)
> >> framework. CDL describes semantic/ conceptual structure of
> >> contents (resources). On the other hand, XML annotates
> >> syntactic structures of contents, and RDF/OWL describes
> >> properties of resources (contents). Structure description and
> >> property description are utterly different but complementary
> >> as well.
> >> Therefore, CDL and RDF/OWL are complementary. Accordingly, in
> >> developing of CDL, the environment of RDF/OWL will be
> >> utilized and the implementation method in RDF/OWL will be
> >> also proposed."
> >>
> >> As an expert in the foundations and the practice of ontology
> >> languages, OWL, and RDF, I'd like to contribute to the
> >> formalisation of the approach in CWL with respect to the know
> >> W3C standards (i.e., RDF and OWL).
> >
> > Very good.
> >
> >> Moreover, given our expertise in the relationships between
> >> ontology languages and natural languages in various contexts,
> >> we could provide interesting foundational insights on the
> >> topic refferred in the charter as: "The CDL.nl redesigned the
> >> UNL specifications in the CDL language".
> >
> > O.K. I will provide the specification of CDL.nl with real top
> > ontology in 2
> > weeks. It will be a good basis for your avtivity.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Uchida
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 07:00:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:14 GMT