W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xformsusers@w3.org > October 2019

Re: On the Expressive Power of Declarative Constructs in Interactive Document Scripts

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:42:47 +0200
To: " XForms" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>, "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Message-ID: <op.z8zhplsqsmjzpq@steven-xps13>
It struck me that we should be making a collection of references to all  
papers about XForms.

Please reply to this message with examples you know that should be  
included. I will collect them all together.

Thanks!

Steven


On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:40:30 +0200, Steven Pemberton  
<steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:

> By John Boyer.
>
> Contains an XForms implementation of quicksort.
>
> ABSTRACT
> It is difficult to generally compare the succinctness of declarative
> versus imperative programming as source code size varies. In imperative  
> programs, basic operations have constant cost, but they
> tend to be more verbose than declarative programs, which increases
> the potential for defects. This paper presents a novel approach for a
> generalized comparison by transforming the problem into comparing  
> executed code size of a benchmark imperative algorithm with
> a partially declarative variant of the same algorithm. This allows
> input size variation to substitute for source code size variation. For
> implementation, we use a multiparadigm language called XForms
> that contains both declarative XPath expressions and imperative
> script actions for interacting with XML data within web and office
> documents. A novel partially declarative variant of the quicksort is
> presented. Amortized analysis shows that onlyO(n) imperative actions are  
> executed, so the expressive power of the declarative constructs is at  
> least Ω(logn). In general, declarative constructs can
> have an order of magnitude expressive power advantage compared
> with only using basic imperative operations. The performance cost
> factor of the expressive power advantage was determined to be
> O(log2 n) based on a novel dynamic projection from the generalized tree  
> structure of XML data to a height balanced binary tree.
>
> https://dl.acm.org/results.cfm?within=owners.owner%3DHOSTED&srt=_score&query=10.1145%2F3342558.3345397&Go.x=0&Go.y=0
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2019 13:43:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:37:52 UTC