Re: XForms and host languages

Dear Owen and All,

Thank you Owen for the concern. I gave my comment on StratML to "Re:
Nations and (the) Web" in this public-xformsusers@w3.org.

Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Minggu, 24 Maret 2019, <owen.ambur@verizon.net> menulis:

> These links open an XForm enabling users to edit the content of
> performance plan templates to document their performance indicators and
> stakeholder roles in support of U.S. federal agency compliance with newly
> enacted requirements set forth in the OPEN Government Data Act and the Evidence-Based
> Policymaking Act:
>
> http://stratml.us/forms/walt5.pl?url=http://stratml.us/
> carmel/iso/part2/SIRMP.xml --> http://stratml.us/carmel/
> iso/part2/SIRMPwStyle.xml
>
> http://stratml.us/forms/walt5.pl?url=http://stratml.us/
> carmel/iso/part2/PP4CDO.xml --> http://stratml.us/carmel/
> iso/part2/PP4CDOwStyle.xml
>
> http://stratml.us/forms/walt5.pl?url=http://stratml.us/
> carmel/iso/part2/PP4CDOC.xml --> http://stratml.us/carmel/
> iso/part2/PP4CDOCwStyle.xml
>
> http://stratml.us/forms/walt5.pl?url=http://stratml.us/
> carmel/iso/part2/PP4EBP.xml --> http://stratml.us/carmel/
> iso/part2/PP4EBPwStyle.xml
>
>
> We have far too much "policy" and "guidance" (e.g., laws & regulations) in
> narrative form and far too few actual performance plans and reports in
> open, standard, machine-readable format.
>
> Owen
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
> To: Andreas Mixich <mixich.andreas@gmail.com>
> Cc: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
> Sent: Fri, Mar 22, 2019 1:10 pm
> Subject: Re: XForms and host languages
>
> Couldn't there be an option, to load XForms externally, like stylesheets
> or scripts?
>
>
> Maybe, if somebody makes a proposal for that.
>
> I think that a proposal should cover the fact that XForms markup is
> typically interleaved with host language markup, which is not the case
> of JavaScript (which runs and then might mutate/generate a DOM, in the case
> of HTML) or XSLT (which applies to input trees and produces result trees).
>
> So should that be a simple inclusion? Should host language markup be
> allowed in the included markup? I am sure there are a few other questions
> that might come up.
>
> -Erik
>