- From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:44:32 -0800
- To: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
- Cc: "public-xformsusers@w3.org" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
Good to hear. I also note that XSLT 2 [1] (and XSLT 3 as well) uses `xs:`. -Erik [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/ On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com> wrote: > Fine for me. I also think it is clearer for the reader to always use the > same prefix. > > Regards, > > Nick > > On 17 Feb 2016 6:21 a.m., Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org> wrote: > > All, > > The spec uses both `xsd:` and `xs:` as prefixes for > `http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema`. XML Schema Part 1 uses `xs:` and > says" > > "For brevity, the text and examples in this specification use the > prefix `xs:` to stand for this namespace" > > while Part 2 [2] also uses `xs:` mostly but uses `xsd:` in a couple of > examples. I suggest we standardize on using `xs:` everywhere. > > If agreed, I can make the changes. > > -Erik > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/ > [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ >
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2016 05:45:20 UTC