- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:17:23 +0100
- To: "Mary Ellen Zurko" <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
On 23 Feb 2010, at 15:11, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > 5) Review Implementation Report Issues > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/open For reference, here's the current state of the issues list: ISSUE-236 Drop redirection chain section (5.4.3) http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/236 ISSUE-237 Augmented Assurance Certificate Elements http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/237 ISSUE-238 Clarify introductory sentence in 6.2 http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/238 ISSUE-239 Consistent presentation of secondary security context information http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/239 ISSUE-240 Clarify "protection level represented by the TLS indicator" http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/240 ISSUE-241 TLS indicator in primary chrome http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/241 ISSUE-242 Change introduction sentences in 6.4.2 and 6.4.3 into context, not conformance http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/242 ISSUE-243 Pre-consent to software installation not implemented http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/243 ISSUE-244 UI conformance criteria for TLS indicator and Identity Signal http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/244 Most of these should be relatively easy; I anticipate that ISSUE-244 is going to be the most tricky one.
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 15:17:26 UTC