Re: obscuring SCI

sold.

I will create the editorial action. 





From:
Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM@Lotus
To:
"Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
Cc:
"public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:
11/17/2009 03:41 PM
Subject:
Re: obscuring SCI
Sent by:
public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org



Ah, I see. Yes that is clearer. 

Going once, going twice ...




From:
Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
To:
Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM@Lotus
Cc:
Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, "public-wsc-wg@w3.org" 
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:
11/17/2009 08:36 AM
Subject:
Re: obscuring SCI
Sent by:
public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org




On 17 Nov 2009, at 14:16, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

> > Looking at this with perhaps slightly fresher eyes, is this "MUST 
> > prevent ... without user interactions" or is this about "interfaces 
> > that display security context information without user 
> > interactions"?  This looks like it needs a bit of clean-up in the 
text.
> 
> I'm not getting what you're getting at. Can you propose two versions 
that get at the difference? 

Perhaps this captures things better:

> Web user agents MUST prevent web content from obscuring, hiding, or 
disabling user interfaces that display security context information, 
except in response to a user interaction.